Research Design & Number of Studies
The best available evidence for family therapies in the treatment of eating disorders includes three meta-analytic reviews and five randomised controlled trials (RCTs). These studies are described below.
The first was a randomised multi-centre trial that evaluated the effectiveness of family therapies in the treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa (3). The study included 169 adolescents and young adults, aged 13-20 years, with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa or eating disorder not otherwise specified. Participants were allocated to a multifamily therapy (MFT) plus family therapy (FT) group or to an FT only group. Participants allocated to MFT received up to 6 weeks of single-family sessions and attended a 4-day MFT programme. Participants allocated to FT received up to 12 months of outpatient therapy which consisted of single-family sessions only. The study was conducted in the United Kingdom.
The second is a meta-analytic review that evaluated the effectiveness of FBT in adolescents with eating disorders (4). The study included 12 RCTs that recruited adolescents and young adults, aged 12–20 years, diagnosed with an eating disorder, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and eating disorder not otherwise specified.
The third meta-analytic review reviewed the effect of eating disorder focused family therapy for children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa. The review included 18 RCTs and investigated variables relating to weight, eating disorder status and remission status.
The first RCT was carried out to determine whether the adjunction of FT intervention, focusing on the improvement of the intra-familial dynamics, would be associated with better outcomes (5). The study included 60 females, aged 13 to 21 years, with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (AN), who were hospitalized at an inpatient unit for AN. Participants were assigned to receive FT or treatment as usual. Follow-up data was collected at 18 months (5) and at 54 months (6). The study was conducted in France.
Another RCT evaluated the effectiveness of FBT in adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) (7). The study was conducted in USA, and included 121 participants, aged 12-18 years, who were living with their parents or legal guardians, and met the criteria for AN excluding the amenorrhea criterion. Participants were assigned to receive FBT or Adolescent-Focused Individual Therapy (AFT). FBT was delivered in twenty-four 1-hour sessions, over a 1-year period.
The fifth study was an RCT conducted in USA that evaluated the effectiveness of FBT (8). The study included 80 adolescents, aged 12 to 19 years, with bulimia nervosa (BN). Participants were assigned to receive FT or supportive psychotherapy. Supportive psychotherapy contains no putative active therapeutic ingredients, such as stimulus-control or problem-solving techniques, or instruction or implicit advice on changes in diet and eating patterns. FBT was delivered in 20 sessions, over a 6-month period.
The above RCT and meta-analytic evidence has been summarised in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 studies comprising 3251 participants (9) which compared family therapy and CBT for eating disorders in routine clinical care.
Outcomes Achieved
Compared to supportive psychotherapy, adolescent-focused therapy, or treatment as usual, the following outcomes were observed;
Children and Young People (CYP) Outcomes
- Significant remission at post-treatment (8), and at 6-and 12-months follow-up (4,7,8).
- Significantly more weight gain at end of treatment for FBT compared to individual psychotherapy (10).
- Significant improvements were observed at post-treatment (3), at 18 months follow-up (Godart et al, 2012), and at 54 months follow-up (6).
- Significantly better BMI and menstrual status at 18- and 54-months (5,6), and mental state score at 54 months (6).
- Moderate to large effect sizes for eating disorder psychopathology at post-treatment with similar benefits in routine clinical settings (9).