Hoarding
Hoarding Disorder (HD) is characterised by a persistent difficulty in discarding possessions, regardless of their prospective value. This is driven by a pronounced need to retain possessions and the considerable distress associated with discarding them (1,2).
Historically, hoarding behaviours were conceptualised as a symptom or subtype of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) due to their frequent association with obsessive thoughts and compulsive rituals (3). Early classification systems, including the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), specifically DSM-III-R (4) and DSM-IV (5) did not recognise hoarding as a distinct disorder, instead, classified hoarding under ‘OCD or related conditions’. However, interventions based on traditional OCD models were often ineffective for individuals whose primary difficulty involved persistent acquisition and inability to discard possessions (6). The seminal cognitive-behavioural model proposed by Frost and Hartl (3) highlighted that core features of hoarding such as difficulty discarding, strong emotional attachment to possessions and substantial functional impairment, differed markedly from classical OCD. Subsequent research suggested that hoarding symptoms frequently occurred independently and responded differently to treatments (7). These developments culminated in the formal recognition of HD as a separate disorder in 2013, with its inclusion in the DSM-5 under ‘Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders’ (1) and its classification in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 11th edition, within mental, behavioural, or neurodevelopmental disorders (2).
The DSM-5 and ICD-11 outline the core diagnostic criteria as follows:
- Persistent difficulty discarding or parting with possessions, regardless of their actual value.
- Accumulation of possessions that congest and clutter active living areas, preventing their intended use.
- Clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning (1,2).
Additional criteria specify that symptoms must persist for a minimum of six months and not be better accounted for by another medical or psychiatric condition. Both classification systems acknowledge heterogeneity in symptom presentation, including variations in insight, which may range from: good or fair to poor or absent, with some individuals exhibiting delusional beliefs regarding possessions as highlighted in the DSM-5. The DSM-5 permits a specifier 'with excessive acquisition', whereas the ICD-11 incorporates excessive acquisition directly within its diagnostic framework (1,2). Current guidance emphasises the use of person-first, non-stigmatising language, recommending terms such as 'person with HD' rather than historically used labels like 'hoarder' (3,8).
Beyond the diagnostic criteria, disorganisation is also common, with belongings often stored chaotically rather than systematically, further exacerbating functional impairment. The types of possessions retained are wide-ranging and can include newspapers, magazines, books, clothing, letters and household items, as well as less typical objects such as packaging, containers and food (9). There are a range of beliefs about possessions, including sentimental (keeping items for emotional reasons) and instrumental (saving possessions for potential future use), that are associated with hoarding severity (10). Related behaviours, such as collecting or living in squalor, differ from HD but may sometimes overlap (3).
HD often severely disrupts daily living and interacts with co-occurring difficulties. Obstructed living spaces can make basic activities such as cooking, cleaning and sleeping difficult or impossible. Many individuals experience pronounced psychological distress, including anxiety, depression and social withdrawal. This can often lead to strong emotional attachments to possessions, which individuals use to help them to regulate emotions instead of adopting adaptive coping strategies (3,11,12). Impairments in decision-making, organisation and task initiation, often compounded by comorbidities such as ADHD or cognitive deficits, can contribute to persistent clutter and reduced independence (13,14). Further information on the impact and comorbidities associated with hoarding can be found in the British Psychological Society good practice guidance: Psychological aspects of hoarding (15).
HD is also associated with low employment rates and significant work impairment. Individuals report an average of seven work-disabled days per month, a figure comparable to psychotic disorders and higher than anxiety or mood disorders. Up to 12% of people with HD face eviction threats and some families experience the removal of children or older relatives from unsafe homes (7). A systematic review by Ong et al. (16) confirmed significant impairments in occupational and social functioning, as well as lower satisfaction with safety and living conditions. Findings on overall quality of life were mixed, reflecting differences in comorbid symptoms, samples and measures used.
The effects of HD extend beyond the individual. Families and carers often report conflict, emotional distress and relationship breakdowns linked to hoarding behaviours. Caregivers experience frustration with repeated failed attempts at decluttering and ongoing anxiety about safety hazards. Hoarded environments pose risks such as fire, falls, infestations and poor sanitation, which can endanger residents, neighbours and emergency personnel (17,18). These risks often place a financial burden on services through repeated interventions, costly clean-ups and sustained housing or social care input. Individuals with HD as a result, also face stigma and social shunning within their communities (19).
HD typically requires input from multiple agencies, as risks often extend beyond the individual’s psychological wellbeing to affect housing, health, safety and family functioning. Steketee et al. (20) highlight the wide range of professionals and community stakeholders who may be involved in the treatment of HD. An extensive range of agencies may be required to work together, however, there can be challenges with this interagency working. Iriss Insight (2026) provides a comprehensive review of literature on the care and interventions for people with Hoarding Disorder, exploring some of the challenges faced by frontline practitioners involved in hoarding-related situations and identifying the need for a trans-disciplinary approach.
These various providers can contribute at different stages of care.
- Identification and engagement: Professionals across sectors should be able to recognise early signs of HD and engage individuals in a non-stigmatising, supportive way. Early recognition allows coordinated responses that prioritise harm reduction and safety (NHS guidance). Readiness to engage with agencies or psychological therapies should be considered with steps taken to help identify issues and increase engagement.
- Assessment and diagnosis: There can be challenges accessing professionals to assess and diagnose but accurate assessment is helpful to distinguish HD from overlapping conditions such as OCD or Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD). Risk assessment should also consider risk to self and others in relation to the home environment and self-neglect. Validated tools including the Hoarding Rating Scale (HRS;) (18), Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R;) (21) Clutter Image Rating (CIR) (22) helps understand and account for comorbidities. Reference to existing guidelines (e.g. OCD Matrix or GAD Matrix) helps understand and account for comorbidities.
- Psychological interventions: CBT adapted for hoarding is currently the recommended treatment (see evidence review below). It targets decision-making, organisation and emotional attachment to possessions, using graded discarding and decluttering tasks (23,24). In-home sessions may help generalise skills (25). Involving families and carers can enhance outcomes, though should be balanced with respect for autonomy (26,27). The British Psychological Society have published Good Practice Guidance on assessment, formulation and delivery of psychological therapies for hoarding (15).
- Multi-agency strategies When health and safety risks are high, multi-agency planning becomes essential. Interventions should consider combining psychological therapy with practical supports such as safe disposal, tenancy preservation and fire risk reduction. Effective coordination across housing, fire, social care and health services can help in delivering sustainable outcomes (17,18,28). All local public protection agencies in Scotland have a self-neglect and hoarding framework in place which should include pathways for psychological and wider mental health support.
Table adapted from Steketee et al. (20)
|
Mental health |
Health |
Social services |
Fire and safety |
Housing |
Others |
|
Psychologists |
Public health/sanitation |
Older adult services |
Fire department |
Housing authority |
Family |
|
Psychiatric nurses |
Allied health professionals |
Child and family services |
Police |
Landlords |
Friends |
|
Social workers |
Emergency medical technicians |
Disability services |
Legal services |
Inspectional Services |
Communities |
|
Psychiatrists |
Veterinarians |
|
Animal control |
|
|
Estimates for HD in the general population range from 2-6%, with pooled prevalence across meta-analyses at about 2.5% (1,25,29-32). In the UK, the Southeast London Community Health study reported a prevalence of 1.5%, with higher rates in urban and socioeconomically deprived areas, likely reflecting increased stress, isolation and reduced access to services (31). Despite these figures, HD remains under-recognised and under-reported, with many people identified only through family or community referrals and relatively few actively seeking professional help (33).
Hoarding behaviours usually begin in adolescence, most commonly between ages 11-15, with around 75% of individuals reporting onset between 10 and 25 years (34). Symptoms typically cause significant impairment by the mid-20s, with many individuals meeting diagnostic criteria by their 30s. Difficulties often become more entrenched with age, as discarding proves increasingly difficult. Older adults (55+) are nearly three times more likely to display severe symptoms, compounded by physical health problems, cognitive decline and reduced social support (30,35,36). Comorbidities are common and include depression, anxiety disorders, OCD, ADHD and Autism, all of which can contribute to organisational and decision-making difficulties and should be considered in treatment (37).
Although HD is formally diagnosed in adulthood, hoarding behaviours can emerge much earlier, with retrospective studies highlighting that symptomatic behaviours often start to emerge in adolescence (18). Studies suggest 2-5% of children and adolescents show clinically significant hoarding symptoms, often linked to family history, anxiety and OCD and associated with academic and social difficulties (38-40). Gender differences also appear across study designs: community surveys suggest slightly higher prevalence in men, particularly with comorbid OCD, while clinical samples are predominantly female, with women more likely to present with excessive acquisition behaviours (41). Familial clustering is pronounced, with up to 50% reporting a first-degree relative who also hoards, highlighting potential of both genetic and environmental contributions (42).
Higher prevalence has been identified in certain groups, including veterans (18), and individuals with OCD (18,43) or ADHD (29,31), with emerging evidence suggesting elevated rates among ethnically diverse and under-researched populations (18,19,29). However, prevalence estimates remain difficult to interpret because of inconsistent methodology, heavy reliance on self-report measures, and limited use of clinical interviews or in-home assessments. As a result, true rates may be underestimated or distorted (44). Reviews emphasise the need for larger, representative studies using rigorous diagnostic methods to provide accurate prevalence data and guide service planning (45).
This information is intended for commissioners, service managers, trainers and healthcare practitioners in Scotland who are considering the evidence base for the delivery of psychological interventions for individuals with HD. It is also designed as a resource for individuals diagnosed with HD, their families and carers, to promote understanding of available treatments and care pathways. This topic overview summarises the current evidence for psychological interventions used to treat HD in children, young people (CYP), adults and older adults (OA). It also outlines the psychological practice and service settings in which these interventions may be delivered across health and social care systems in Scotland.
This topic does not cover pharmacological interventions or interventions which are not informed by psychological theory. It may be helpful to refer to The Matrix pages on OCD and NICE OCD guidelines if there are comorbid OCD symptoms. There are a wider range of non-psychological interventions and supports that are beyond the scope of this topic and further guidance can be found on NHS Inform, from charities supporting people affected by hoarding (e.g. Iriss – https://www.iriss.org.uk/projects-day-day-dignity/supporting-people-who-hoard, Hoarding Disorders UK, Hoarding UK, Mind, and SAMH. Practical support and advice can be provided from Citizen’s Advice Scotland https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/scotland/ and Local Authority Environmental Health or Housing Services.
Children and Young People (CYP)
The current evidence base for hoarding in CYP is extremely limited. Due to its reclassification in 2013, only a very small number of studies exist, and these have largely been conducted within specialist OCD clinic populations rather than through hoarding-specific randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (38,39). Research in this area has typically examined hoarding as a symptom dimension of OCD rather than as a distinct diagnosis (40). This reflects the fact that HD was only recently reclassified as a separate disorder in DSM-5, meaning that much of the earlier literature conceptualised it within the OCD spectrum.
Systematic reviews suggest that hoarding symptoms can emerge in early childhood, but treatment efficacy has not been established (40).
At present, there is no RCT-level evidence for the application of psychological therapies or interventions specifically for CYP with hoarding. Interventions described in the adult table may be considered with appropriate adaptation, in line with guidance on delivering effective psychological therapies and interventions to younger populations. As there is considerable overlap with other presentations, particularly OCD and GAD, please refer to other Matrix evidence summaries as appropriate (e.g., OCD Matrix, GAD Matrix).
Overview of evidence for adults
Across trials, hoarding severity has been assessed using a small set of standardised measures that capture changes in clutter volume and in the individual’s ability to manage clutter. However, there are limitations in these methods, including reliance on self-report, inconsistent assessment of functional impairment and limited use of in-home observations, which restrict the ability to capture the full impact of hoarding on health, safety and quality of life.
The evidence for psychological therapies in adults with HD has been reviewed in numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and synthesised in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, with the highest quality evidence summarised here.
A recent review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions for HD included 41 studies (of which 8 were randomised control trials) and found a large reduction in HD symptomatology at end of treatment with similar findings across different psychological interventions and types of delivery (e.g. individual, group, with or without home visits). However, although symptom improvements are reported, many participants remain within the clinical range following intervention. The review also highlights the need to increase participant diversity and drop-out rates in trials, emphasising the importance of addressing motivational challenges in HD treatment. Long-term outcomes and relapse also remain under-studied (40,46,47). It is also important to recognise that HD remains under-recognised, and many individuals do not seek psychological help, or are not ready to engage with it. Identification and professional involvement often occur through housing or environmental health routes rather than mental health services. As a result, the contexts in which psychological therapies, such as CBT, have been examined in clinical trials may not reflect the service responses most experienced in routine practice, where access to structured psychological therapy is often limited.
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) adapted for hoarding is the most studied psychological intervention across individual and group delivery formats. Other approaches with emerging or more modest evidence include therapist-supported self-help (e.g., Buried in Treasures programmes), peer-facilitated groups (46,47) and multi-component models such as Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Therapy (CREST). These alternatives have been examined in studies, including contexts where access to individual therapy is limited.
Individual CBT
The evidence for individual CBT is summarised in three meta-analyses (24,48,49) which demonstrated substantial improvements (large effect sizes) in hoarding symptoms. Research focusing on CBT for HD developed steadily since the first manualised programme was introduced by Steketee and Frost (14). Their 20-26 session model (typically delivered in 60–90-minute weekly appointments) was created in response to the limited impact of traditional OCD-based CBT on hoarding symptoms (24,50). It is the psychological treatment most frequently examined in clinical trials for HD. The Steketee & Frost model (14), subsequently tested in controlled trials (51,52), sets out a structured, multi-component programme that includes: psychoeducation, motivational interviewing strategies, cognitive restructuring, skills training, behavioural experiments and exposure tasks, homework assignments, and relapse prevention. There are also optional home visits, where therapists provide live coaching in the client’s environment, helping them practise decision-making on their own possessions.
The CBT protocol was associated with reductions of distress and increased ability to discard possessions compared with a waitlist control, although clutter was slower to change and full remission remained rare (51). This trial reported changes in hoarding symptoms following delivery of hoarding-specific CBT. Similarly, Tolin et al. (24) reported reductions in hoarding severity across emotional, cognitive and behavioural domains. Gilliam et al. (25) tested a shorter version of the programme and reported changes in discarding and reduced acquiring, although effects were smaller than those achieved with the full protocol. Some adaptations have incorporated home visits, enabling clients to practise skills directly in their living environment. Muroff et al. (52) also reported changes in organisation and decision-making, although a later meta-analysis concluded that home visits are not essential for positive outcomes overall (48).
Systematic reviews by Williams and Viscusi, and Thomson et al. (53,54) reported reductions in hoarding symptoms following individual CBT in relation to discarding, acquiring control and distress. These reviews also note limitations including small sample sizes, high dropout and challenges in maintaining progress. Follow-up data presented by O’Brien and Laws (55) across more than forty studies indicated that hoarding scores at 6-12 months post-treatment were comparable to those observed at the end of intervention. Across reviews, clutter is consistently identified as the symptom least likely to change, reflecting both the volume of accumulated possessions and their emotional significance.
In clinical studies, CBT has most commonly been delivered in moderate to severe or more complex presentations, particularly where symptoms are associated with significant distress, functional impairment, or safety risks. Most clinical trials have recruited participants scoring above established clinical cut-offs on standardised measures such as the Saving Inventory–Revised (SI-R; (21) and the Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview (HRS-I; (18). However, the presentation and functional impact of HD vary considerably across individuals. Accordingly, individual CBT should not be conceptualised as limited to a fixed severity threshold, but rather as an intervention that can be flexibly adapted across a range of presentations in line with individual clinical need.
Group CBT
Group CBT adapts the hoarding-specific model for delivery in a shared setting, usually across 13-20 weekly sessions lasting around two hours. These programmes are manualised, based on the structured treatment first developed by Steketee and Frost (14) and include the same core components as individual therapy. The group format includes peer support, shared problem-solving and discussion of experiences, which participants describe as motivating and reassuring (49,52).
Evidence from clinical trials (24,25,52,56) and systematic reviews (48,49) demonstrates that group CBT is effective in reducing hoarding severity. Some trials have described smaller changes compared to individual CBT (24) but a recent review (55) indicated no difference in effect between individual and group CBT.
Rodgers et al. (48) found no consistent advantage of adding home visits to the treatment format but noted that group formats allow delivery to multiple participants for services with limited resources. Group delivery allows intervention to be delivered to multiple participants and includes peer interaction. Reviews highlight peer support and reduced isolation as commonly reported features of the group format (49). Group CBT has been described in the literature within stepped-care frameworks, where group therapy may precede individual interventions in some service contexts (48). This format also allows delivery to multiple participants simultaneously and includes shared discussion, peer interaction and accountability within the group setting, which studies describe as relevant for services aiming to reach larger numbers of people and for individuals who report benefiting from shared experience (48,49,52).
Self-help and peer-facilitated programmes
Self-help approaches represent a lower-intensity form of intervention and draw on the same CBT principles as therapist-led interventions. The best-known example is the Buried in Treasures (BiT) programme, a structured workbook course delivered over 12-15 sessions. The programme includes psychoeducation about hoarding, cognitive techniques for challenging unhelpful beliefs and stepwise decluttering exercises. Homework tasks, such as discarding a set number of items per week are intended to support learning and build tolerance of anxiety. Programmes also emphasise decision-making and resisting acquiring, encouraging participants to test predictions about changing behaviour (25,37).
Evidence suggests that these programmes are associated with changes in hoarding symptoms. Williams and Viscusi (53) and Wheaton (50) reported changes particularly in excessive acquiring and motivation to discard, while clutter change was limited. Peer-led versions of BiT have also been evaluated in North American studies, where trained peers deliver structured support in North America (25,37).However, there remain significant evidence gaps in understanding adverse outcomes and longer-term effectiveness of these approaches.
Other psychological approaches
Alternative therapies for HD have been explored, but the current evidence for these approaches remains limited. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has been trialled in three small studies showing symptom reductions but with no control groups and short follow-up (55,57). Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT) has been piloted in an uncontrolled cohort, targeting shame and self-criticism, with preliminary findings reported (55). Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Therapy (CREST) has been examined in controlled and community studies. In an RCT with 37 older adults, Ayers et al. (58) reported greater reductions in hoarding severity and improved functioning compared with case management, and a community study also reported changes in clutter reduction and housing stability (59).
Systematic reviews describe these alternative models as having been delivered in small studies, with the evidence remaining preliminary and of low quality (50,55). Trials of approaches such as rational-emotive therapy, peer-led groups, social-cognition training, and virtual reality are limited to small studies or case reports and have shown mixed and limited findings (48,55,60). While these approaches may inform future developments, the current evidence is limited to small or uncontrolled studies and not established enough to include as a recommendation at this time.
Learning disabilities
In the absence of specific evidence for psychological therapies for adults with learning disabilities, the guidance for adults applies. Clinicians are advised that there are differences in presentation of psychological problems in people with learning disabilities and to consult Delivering Effective Psychological Therapies and Interventions for People with Learning Disabilities for further information on factors relevant to practice.
Older adults
Research on psychological therapies for older adults (OA) remains limited. Studies report reductions in hoarding severity and changes in anxiety, depression and daily functioning, but methodological limitations include small samples, limited controls and short follow-up. Standard hoarding-specific CBT has been tested in this group, and studies report symptom reductions and improvements in decision-making, however, outcomes are less consistent than in younger adult populations, dropout rates are higher, and the overall evidence base remains too limited to draw firm conclusions.
One intervention tested in this age group is Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Therapy (CREST). It was developed in recognition that older adults with HD frequently experience impairments in executive functioning, planning, memory and attention, which impact on delivery of CBT for HD (61,62). CREST integrates CBT components such as psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, cognitive restructuring and graded discarding with cognitive rehabilitation exercises. In a randomised controlled trial, Ayers et al. (58) reported greater reductions in hoarding severity and improvements in daily functioning compared with case management and hoarding scores at follow-up were comparable to those recorded post-intervention. A community-based adaptation also reported changes n clutter and housing stability, with participants at lower risk of eviction after treatment (59). Both studies described good participant engagement and noted that the cognitive rehabilitation elements were relevant to participation in the intervention compared with standard CBT.
Other approaches tested in older adults include group CBT and therapist-supported self-help. Studies of these formats report smaller changes in hoarding severity compared to individual CBT or CREST. Overall, outcomes in older adults are similar to those in the wider HD literature: some show partial improvement, with clutter remaining the symptom less likely to change. Age-tailored adaptations such as CREST are associated with participant engagement and greater reductions in hoarding severity compared with standard CBT (58,59).
Overview of Evidence for Harms and Adverse Effects
Like all treatments, psychological therapies for HD can cause adverse effects, though these are rarely monitored or reported systematically in clinical trials (see information relating to safety in the delivery of psychological therapies). Reported therapy-related harms most commonly involve transient increases in distress during exposure-based tasks such as sorting, organising or discarding possessions. When not appropriately paced or supported, such tasks may lead to short-term anxiety, emotional dysregulation, or temporary worsening of hoarding behaviours, particularly among individuals with low insight, cognitive impairment or high levels of comorbid distress (63). Importantly, there is limited high-quality evidence regarding the prevalence, severity, or duration of adverse effects associated specifically with psychological therapies for HD, and few studies include formal monitoring of negative outcomes or dropout-related harms. As a result, the risk profile for hoarding-specific psychological therapies remains unclear.
Distinct from therapy-related effects are the harms associated with non-therapeutic and coercive interventions, most notably forced or coerced clearouts conducted in response to housing, fire, or public health concerns. Qualitative studies consistently report that such interventions can result in profound distress, loss of trust in services, increased attachment to possessions, disengagement from future support, and, in some cases, significant psychological deterioration (64,65). These harms arise not as side effects of psychological treatment but as consequences of system-level responses to unmanaged risk.
Alongside psychological therapies, multi-agency harm-reduction approaches are frequently employed to address immediate safety concerns such as fire risk, eviction, or severe sanitation issues. These approaches typically involve coordinated input from housing services, fire and rescue services, social care, and health providers, and may include case management, tenancy-preservation schemes, and home safety interventions. A recent review by Twigger et al. (28) reported consistent improvements in housing-related outcomes, including reduced eviction risk and enhanced safety, although the evidence base largely comprises service evaluations rather than randomised controlled trials. Reviews consistently conclude that multi-agency harm-reduction approaches play a critical role in managing risk and maintaining housing stability, particularly for individuals who are unwilling or unable to engage in psychological therapy. However, these approaches address safety rather than the underlying psychological drivers of hoarding and should not be considered substitutes for therapeutic intervention. Future research should prioritise systematic monitoring of both therapeutic and system-level harms, alongside outcomes that reflect quality of life, trust in services, and long-term housing stability.
See adult table for recommendations with age-appropriate adjustments in line with guidance on delivering effective psychological therapies and interventions to children and young people.
| Recommendation | Who for? | List of Interventions | Type of psychological practice | Evidence | Efficacy |
| First Line | Adults presenting with moderate to severe HD (meeting diagnostic cut-off; significant distress/functional impairment) | Hoarding-specific individual CBT (face-to-face, 2-26 sessions, with homework and optional home visits) (55) | Specialist | A | Medium-high |
| First Line | Adults presenting with moderate HD, or in cases where individual therapy is not accessible, may be appropriately offered group CBT as an alternative or first-line intervention | Group CBT (Manualised, 13-20 sessions, face-to-face, with in-session sorting and structured homework) (55) | Enhanced/Specialist | A | Medium-high |
| First Line | Older adults with moderate to severe HD | CREST. Individual, face-to-face, 20+ sessions; integrates CBT with cognitive rehabilitation (planning, attention, memory) and live sorting/discarding tasks (58) | Specialist | B | Medium |
| Alternative (evidence less established) | Adults with mild HD or those reluctant/unable to commit to intensive therapy | elf-help programmes (e.g., Buried in Treasures workbook, 12-15 sessions; therapist-supported or guided self-help where available) (55) | skilled | B | Low–medium |
1.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) | Psychiatry Online2013; . Accessed Mar 12, 2026.
2.World Health Organization. ICD-11: International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision). 2019.
3.Frost RO, Hartl TL. A cognitive-behavioral model of compulsive hoarding. Behav Res Ther 1996;34(4):341–350.
4.Pichot P. [DSM-III: the 3d edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders from the American Psychiatric Association]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1986;142(5):489–499.
5.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) | American Journal of Psychiatry 1994.
6.Bloch MH, Bartley CA, Zipperer L, Jakubovski E, Landeros-Weisenberger A, Pittenger C, et al. Meta-analysis: hoarding symptoms associated with poor treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2014 Sep;19(9):1025–1030.
7.Steketee G, Frost R. Compulsive hoarding: current status of the research. Clin Psychol Rev 2003 Dec;23(7):905–927.
8.National Institutes of Health. Person-first and Destigmatizing Language. 2020.
9.Ayers C.R., Schiehser D., Liu L., Loebach Wetherell J. Functional impairment in geriatric hoarding participants. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 2012;1(4):263–266.
10.Smith A, Nathwani F, Barry T, Gregory JD. Beliefs about possessions associated with Hoarding Disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2026 Feb 15;395(Pt A):120698.
11.Worden B, Levy HC, Das A, Katz BW, Stevens M, Tolin DF. Perceived emotion regulation and emotional distress tolerance in patients with hoarding disorder. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive & Related Disorders 2019 Jul;22.
12.Phung PJ, Moulding R, Taylor JK, Nedeljkovic M. Emotional regulation, attachment to possessions and hoarding symptoms. Scand J Psychol 2015 Oct;56(5):573–581.
13.Sordo Vieira L, Guastello A, Nguyen B, Nutley SK, Ordway A, Simpson H, et al. Identifying psychiatric and neurological comorbidities associated with hoarding disorder through network analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2022;156:16–24.
14.Steketee, G., & Frost, R. O. Compulsive Hoarding and Acquiring. 2006; . Accessed Mar 13, 2026.
15.The British Psychological Society. A psychological perspective on hoarding. 2024; .
16.Ong C, Pang S, Sagayadevan V, Chong SA, Subramaniam M. Functioning and quality of life in hoarding: A systematic review. J Anxiety Disord 2015 May;32:17–30.
17.de la Cruz L.F., Nordsletten A.E., MataixCols D. Ethnocultural aspects of hoarding disorder. Current Psychiatry Reviews 2016;12(2):115–123.
18.Tolin DF, Frost RO, Steketee G. A brief interview for assessing compulsive hoarding: the Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview. Psychiatry Res 2010 Jun 30;178(1):147–152.
19.Frost RO, Steketee G, Williams L. Hoarding: a community health problem. Health Soc Care Community 2000 -07;8(4):229–234.
20.Steketee G. Presidential Address: Team Science Across Disciplines: Advancing CBT Research and Practice on Hoarding. Behavior Therapy 2018;49(5):643–652.
21.Frost RO, Steketee G, Grisham J. Measurement of compulsive hoarding: saving inventory-revised. Behaviour Research & Therapy 2004 Oct;42(10):1163–1182.
22.Frost R.O., Steketee G., Tolin D.F., Renaud S. Development and validation of the clutter image rating. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 2008;30(3):193–203.
23.Gail Steketee, , Randy O. Frost. Treatment for Hoarding Disorder: Therapist Guide.
24.Tolin D.F., Frost R.O., Steketee G., Muroff J. Cognitive behavioral therapy for hoarding disorder: A meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety 2015;32(3):158–166.
25.Gilliam CM, Norberg MM, Villavicencio A, Morrison S, Hannan SE, Tolin DF. Group cognitive-behavioral therapy for hoarding disorder: an open trial. Behaviour Research & Therapy 2011 Nov;49(11):802–807.
26.Wilbram M, Kellett S, Beail N. Compulsive hoarding: a qualitative investigation of partner and carer perspectives. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2008 Mar;47(Pt 1):59–73.
27.Chasson GS, Carpenter A, Ewing J, Gibby B, Lee N. Empowering families to help a loved one with Hoarding Disorder: pilot study of Family-As-Motivators training. Behaviour Research & Therapy 2014 Dec;63:9–16.
28.Daisy Twigger, James D. Gregory, Emma Bowers, , Josie F. A. Millar. Psychosocial Interventions for Hoarding Disorder: A Systematic Review. 2024.
29.Postlethwaite A, Kellett S, Mataix-Cols D. Prevalence of Hoarding Disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2019;256:309–316.
30.Samuels JF, Bienvenu OJ, Grados MA, Cullen B, Riddle MA, Liang K, et al. Prevalence and correlates of hoarding behavior in a community-based sample. Behaviour Research & Therapy 2008 Jul;46(7):836–844.
31.Nordsletten AE, Monzani B, Fernandez de la Cruz L, Iervolino AC, Fullana MA, Harris J, et al. Overlap and specificity of genetic and environmental influences on excessive acquisition and difficulties discarding possessions: Implications for hoarding disorder. American Journal of Medical Genetics.Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics: the Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics 2013;162B(4):380–387.
32.Timpano KR, Exner C, Glaesmer H, Rief W, Keshaviah A, Brahler E, et al. The epidemiology of the proposed DSM-5 hoarding disorder: exploration of the acquisition specifier, associated features, and distress. J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(6):780–786.
33.Bratiotis, C., Davidow, J., Glossner, K., & Steketee, G. . Requests for help with hoarding: Who needs what from whom? 2016; .
34.Dozier ME, Porter B, Ayers CR. Age of onset and progression of hoarding symptoms in older adults with hoarding disorder. Aging & Mental Health 2016;20(7):736–742.
35.Ayers CR, Dozier ME. Predictors of hoarding severity in older adults with hoarding disorder. International Psychogeriatrics 2015 Jul;27(7):1147–1156.
36.Cath DC, Nizar K, Boomsma D, Mathews CA. Age-Specific Prevalence of Hoarding and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Population-Based Study. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2017 Mar;25(3):245–255.
37.Frost RO, Steketee G, Tolin DF. Comorbidity in hoarding disorder. Depression & Anxiety 2011 Oct 03;28(10):876–884.
38.Storch EA, Lack CW, Merlo LJ, Geffken GR, Jacob ML, Murphy TK, et al. Clinical features of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder and hoarding symptoms. Compr Psychiatry 2007;48(4):313–318.
39.Sheppard B, Chavira D, Azzam A, Grados MA, Umana P, Garrido H, et al. ADHD prevalence and association with hoarding behaviors in childhood-onset OCD. Depression & Anxiety 2010 Jul;27(7):667–674.
40.Fernandez de la Cruz L, Micali N, Roberts S, Turner C, Nakatani E, Heyman I, et al. Are the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder temporally stable in children/adolescents? A prospective naturalistic study. Psychiatry Res 2013 Sep 30;209(2):196–201.
41.Woody SR, Lenkic P, Bratiotis C, Kysow K, Luu M, Edsell-Vetter J, et al. How well do hoarding research samples represent cases that rise to community attention?. Behaviour Research & Therapy 2020;126:103555.
42.Canale, A., & Klontz, B. Hoarding Disorder: It’s More Than Just an Obsession - Implications for Financial Therapists and Planners. 2013; . Accessed Mar 12, 2026.
43.Fullana MA, Vilagut G, Rojas-Farreras S, Mataix-Cols D, de Graaf R, Demyttenaere K, et al. Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions in the general population: results from an epidemiological study in six European countries. J Affect Disord 2010 Aug;124(3):291–299.
44.Kim HJ, Steketee G, Frost RO. Hoarding by elderly people. Health Soc Work 2001 Aug;26(3):176–184.
45.Fernández de la Cruz L, Mataix-Cols D. Hoarding Disorder. A Transdiagnostic Approach to Obsessions, Compulsions and Related Phenomena. 2019; . Accessed Mar 11, 2026.
46.Mathews CA, Mackin RS, Chou C, Uhm SY, Bain LD, Stark SJ, et al. Randomised clinical trial of community-based peer-led and psychologist-led group treatment for hoarding disorder. BJPsych Open 2018 Jul;4(4):285–293.
47.Delucchi KL, Mathews CA, Mackin RS, Chou C, Uhm SY, Bain LD, et al. Comparing Peer-Led Support Groups with Therapist-Led Support Groups for Treating Hoarding Disorder. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) 2019.
48.Rodgers N, McDonald S, Wootton BM. Cognitive behavioral therapy for hoarding disorder: An updated meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2021;290:128–135.
49.Bodryzlova Y, Audet J, Bergeron K, O'Connor K. Group cognitive-behavioural therapy for hoarding disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Health & Social Care in the Community 2019 May;27(3):517–530.
50.Wheaton MG. Understanding and treating hoarding disorder: A review of cognitive-behavioral models and treatment. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 2016;9:43–50.
51.Steketee G, Frost RO, Tolin DF, Rasmussen J, Brown TA. Waitlist-controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy for hoarding disorder. Depression & Anxiety 2010 May;27(5):476–484.
52.Muroff J, Steketee G, Rasmussen J, Gibson A, Bratiotis C, Sorrentino C. Group cognitive and behavioral treatment for compulsive hoarding: a preliminary trial. Depression & Anxiety 2009;26(7):634–640.
53.Williams M, Viscusi JA. Hoarding Disorder and a Systematic Review of Treatment with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 2016;45(2):93–110.
54.Thompson C, Fernandez de la Cruz L, Mataix-Cols D, Onwumere J. A systematic review and quality assessment of psychological, pharmacological, and family-based interventions for hoarding disorder. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 2017 Jun;27:53–66.
55.O'Brien E, Laws KR. Decluttering Minds: Psychological interventions for hoarding disorder - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2025 Jan;181:738–751.
56.Tolin D.F., Frost R.O., Steketee G., Muroff J. Cognitive behavioral therapy for hoarding disorder: A meta-analysis. Focus (United States) 2021;19(4):158–166.
57.Twohig, M. P., Vilardaga, J. C. P., Levin, M. E., & Hayes, S. C. Changes in psychological flexibility during acceptance and commitment therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder. 2015; .
58.Ayers CR, Dozier ME, Twamley EW, Saxena S, Granholm E, Mayes TL, et al. Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Therapy (CREST) for Hoarding Disorder in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2018;79(2):16m11072.
59.Pittman JOE, Davidson EJ, Dozier ME, Blanco BH, Baer KA, Twamley EW, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a community-based treatment for late-life hoarding. International Psychogeriatrics 2021;33(9):977–986.
60.DiMauro J., Genova M., Tolin D.F., Kurtz MM. Cognitive remediation for neuropsychological impairment in hoarding disorder: A pilot study. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 2014;3(2):132–138.
61.Grisham JR, Norberg MM, Williams AD, Certoma SP, Kadib R. Categorization and cognitive deficits in compulsive hoarding. Behaviour Research & Therapy 2010 Sep;48(9):866–872.
62.Ayers CR, Saxena S, Golshan S, Wetherell JL. Age at onset and clinical features of late life compulsive hoarding. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010 Feb;25(2):142–149.
63.David J, Crone C, Norberg MM. A critical review of cognitive behavioural therapy for hoarding disorder: How can we improve outcomes? Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 2022 Mar;29(2):469–488.
64.McGrath M, Russell AM, Masterson C. 'A more human approach ... I haven't found that really': Experiences of hoarding difficulties and seeking help. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 2024;52(1):1–13.
65.Parker H, Waddington L, Shergold B, Gregory JD. Professionals' and non-professionals' experiences of working with people with Hoarding Disorder: A thematic synthesis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2025.